Cake, Drake, Drupal and a Duck

I have been studying both Cake and CI for a while, and I found both are just indispensible. Both have their strengths and weaknesses. But according to the blog, whose owner tested them with a benchmarking tool, CI seemed to be able to carry out more requests in a second than Cake and Symfony for a simple “echo” function. Symfony wasn’t my choice, since it doesn’t support PHP4.

I like Cake for its ORM feature and Ajax helpers. I like CI for it’s flexibility. If CI had built-in support for ORM, I would have never used Cake again. Coding Cake is strict but it makes our life easier when we follow Cake’s naming convention. I don’t even have to write SQL even when working with tables in relationships. CI has an add-on called Rapyd to provide ORM. For the time being I’m feeling more comfortable with Cake’s built-in ORM.

I have already developed some projects, including Shwe Pyi Hein Monastry, using CI. It is less restrictive than Cake, and it is the one I studid first, I’m more familiar with that. But it doesn’t stop me from using Cake also 😉

Drupal is one of the best CMS I’ve ever seen. In addition to Drupal, I have used PHP-Nuke, Postnuke, e107, Mambo, and Joomla. But now I have removed PHP-Nuke for its overhead and bugs, Postnuke for slow development. e107, Mambo/Joomla have got a lot of built-in features compared to Drupal.

Although I have not tested yet, Cake can be placed as a plug-in/extension for Drupal (via project Drake), and Joomla. If I’m too lazy to learn Drupal API or Joomla API, it will be my saviour.

no responses for Cake, Drake, Drupal and a Duck

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *